Sunday, February 24, 2013
The First Step to Persuading All: Understand Scientists Are Not God
You are a science writer. You report ONLY the findings of doctors and researchers. The news that you report is correct, will always be correct, because it comes from science. Hours and hours of research have been done just for you to write a short article that will be put only at the back of the newspaper once a week. Therefore, what you write will always be correct.
WRONG!
Science makes mistakes. Scientists come to many wrong conclusions.
As Lemony Snicket said in The Blank Book, “It is very unnerving to be proven wrong, particularly when you are really right and the person who is wrong is proving you wrong and proving himself, wrongly, right.” It is frustrating to those who think they are right but told their thoughts are wrong. This happens amongst science writers and scientists alike. Science advocates essentially tell science writers that their ideas are incorrect. It is difficult to not take it this negativity to heart.
Think about Nietzsche’s view, “There are no facts, only interpretations.” Many people will ignore scientific evidence because that is not their interpretation of the world. Science writers need to understand that because something is perceived as correct and science proves that it is correct does not mean that it is correct. There could be many other answers or avenues that science has not yet discovered. Science writers should not laugh at their potential readers since the readers do not have the same interpretation of the research being presented. Embrace your readers or the result may be that you will have no readers. Do more research. Science is not willing to hand you the answer.
Friday, February 8, 2013
The First Step to Gifting Science: Wrap It
Science is a gift that not many people appreciate. They don't understand her complexities and don't take advantage of her gift. It is up to science writers to give science in order to benefit the common good. Science writers need to almost hide the scientific portion of science in order to entice readers to read their articles. The gift of science must be wrapped.
Sarah Vowell could not have said it better, "What are you hiding? No one ever asks that." Why is that people always question the ideas that are out in the open, but don't question those that we choose to hide? It is not the fact of seeing it; it is that people choose avoidance. If science writers were able to wrap the gift of science, readers may not question the gift, they would blindly accept.
When a science writer can 'hide' their gift of science from the public's view, more readers will read. If done correctly, there will be an increase in scientific literacy and understanding. Gifts are almost always well received; let's make it our goal so that people want to receive the gift of science.
Sarah Vowell could not have said it better, "What are you hiding? No one ever asks that." Why is that people always question the ideas that are out in the open, but don't question those that we choose to hide? It is not the fact of seeing it; it is that people choose avoidance. If science writers were able to wrap the gift of science, readers may not question the gift, they would blindly accept.
When a science writer can 'hide' their gift of science from the public's view, more readers will read. If done correctly, there will be an increase in scientific literacy and understanding. Gifts are almost always well received; let's make it our goal so that people want to receive the gift of science.
Saturday, February 2, 2013
The First Step to Marrying Science: Appreciate Every Quark… Quirk
Let’s face it: Science requires much love and attention. One
must keep up with the current trends and continue to follow her work. Just like
a marriage, one should love her every quirk. Tell her that she looks thin even
though she looks fat. If she makes some bad cooking, tell her it was the finest
meal you ever had. Please her, please her, and please her some more.
The problem with science is that as one matures, she becomes
more complicated. It’s you, not her. Science changes, but so does everyone
else. School requires that one learns specific scientific material. One can no
longer study the science that they want. That is, no more reading about
dinosaurs, no more eating dirt, and definitely no more fun with science.
As Judy Garland spoke about love, “For it was not into my
ear you whispered, but into my heart. It was not my lips you kissed, but my
soul.” When we are young, we get to choose our science. We choose to study
dinosaurs or insects; science is speaking to our hearts and kissing our souls.
When one gets to a school age, one must learn what the teacher and curriculum
dictates. Sometimes this turns students away from science; she is now only
whispering into our ears and kissing our lips. We are not open to loving her
and appreciating her because we feel that we are being pushed to love her.
There is not a definite solution to help fix the school curriculum
and encourage students to love science. It would take many years and many board
rooms to fix that problem. However, if science writers could find a way to
write in a more efficient and understanding manner, the public may learn to love
dinosaurs and appreciate science again in order to grow old with that
knowledge.
Friday, January 25, 2013
The First Step to Becoming a Better Science Writer: Write for All
Science might not be the love of everyone’s life, but as a
science writer you want it to be. Every day, you hope that many people read
your work, reflecting on your thoughts and research from the first word to the
last. However, this does not always happen, causing a dilemma for both the
writer and the readers. One solution: write for all.
As Alexandre Dumas said in The Three Musketeers, “All for one, and one for all!” A science
writer has one shot, one chance to let readers understand the topic and believe
in that written subject. This one shot MUST be for all. People need to read and
understand the topic and heed its warnings.
Now, realistically, is one article going to touch every
person? Probably not. Science writers need to come together and recognize this
as a problem. Here are some ideas:
-Write as if your reader knows nothing about the topic. Give
them background information. Make them feel as if they did the research
themselves.
-Understand that not everyone is going to agree with your
opinion. Write without a bias so that more people can appreciate your
work.
-Don’t use superfluous and perplexing words! People just get
confused.
-Don’t choose sides. People have many political views. If
your views shine through your work, others make decide to reject your news.
-Read this blog. More tips will be posted as I become a
better science writer myself.
This problem may not be fixed overnight. Certain people do
not like to read about science and as science writers, our goal is to change
that train of thought. The more readers who are able to interpret, understand,
and appreciate science, the more scientific articles will be read.
Monday, January 21, 2013
The First Step to Strengthening Democracy: Educate Liberally
Education can be said to be the most powerful weapon of a
human. However, through the proper use of an education, vaccines can be
created, treaties can be signed, and discoveries can be made. Much debate
occurs as to the most efficient way to educate American students. Some believe
that the best education still follows the 3R’s: reading, writing, and arithmetic.
Others believe in strict trade school learning, to be taught only what you will
need to become a good citizen to society or to enter a career. However, there
is a third school of thought: a liberal education.
As Robert M. Hutchins said, “A liberal education... frees a
man from the prison-house of his class, race, time, place, background, family
and even his nation.” What America needs is to break each and every one of
these barriers in order to strengthen our democracy. People need to learn to
break the status quo. Education is becoming more of a way to transfer the
government’s ideas to the people, without learning to think for oneself.
From the words of Albert Einstein, “Education is what
remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school.” Students may
not retain the lesson on the area of a trapezoid or the depth of the ocean
floor. However, students will remember the liberal arts aspect of their
education. When we teach students to think for themselves, they will have more
ideas. As people have more ideas, more problems can be fixed in society. As we
fix more problems, our democracy has the chance to be strengthened. Liberal education
alone will not strengthen democracy, but it will provide our students with the
means to fix it.
Thursday, January 17, 2013
The First Step to Blogging: Think
"I think; therefore I am." - Rene Descartes
Thinking outside the box.
Thinking outside the box.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)